<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CEO on Financial Analysis &#187; Net Present</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/tag/net-present/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com</link>
	<description>Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Financial Analysis paradox Part 1: Which is the method that lays one step behind in evolution from “Net Present Value”, and yet delivers a better result when used in “Company based scenarios”?</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CashFlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Analysis Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Plan Evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Present Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problems of Net Present Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Present]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a method that's older than NPV delivers a better result <a href="https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
