<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Financial Analysis paradox Part 1: Which is the method that lays one step behind in evolution from “Net Present Value”, and yet delivers a better result when used in “Company based scenarios”?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/</link>
	<description>Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why do Financial Analysts perform CashFlow on spreadsheet and don’t use the CashFlow module of their ERP? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Why do Financial Analysts perform CashFlow on spreadsheet and don’t use the CashFlow module of their ERP? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] a global scale, Financial Analysts are still performing the CashFlow on a spreadsheet, using the “Monthly Average” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a global scale, Financial Analysts are still performing the CashFlow on a spreadsheet, using the “Monthly Average” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why ERPs can never be used in Financial Analysis: Incompatibility of Data set between Accounting and Budgeting, and the two missing mechanisms &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Why ERPs can never be used in Financial Analysis: Incompatibility of Data set between Accounting and Budgeting, and the two missing mechanisms &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] make an Accounting entry out of the forecasted sum, would not yield any better result than the “Monthly Average” method. However this action (performed within an ERP) will deprive the user of all the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make an Accounting entry out of the forecasted sum, would not yield any better result than the “Monthly Average” method. However this action (performed within an ERP) will deprive the user of all the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the 100% accurate method to calculate “Profit &#38; Loss” that has existed for centuries, but needs to be tweaked in order to be compatible with Financial Analysis? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the 100% accurate method to calculate “Profit &#38; Loss” that has existed for centuries, but needs to be tweaked in order to be compatible with Financial Analysis? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] we have previously seen, on a global level, Accounting &amp; Finance professionals use the “Monthly Average” method, or the “Net Present Value” method, or the IRR method, to perform “Investment Plan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have previously seen, on a global level, Accounting &amp; Finance professionals use the “Monthly Average” method, or the “Net Present Value” method, or the IRR method, to perform “Investment Plan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Financial Analyst’s wish list Part 1: Attack of the multicolored spreadsheet &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>A Financial Analyst’s wish list Part 1: Attack of the multicolored spreadsheet &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] or an Investment Plan evaluation. No matter which is the method that you have used (the “Monthly Average” method, or the “Net Present Value” method, or the “Internal Rate of Return” method), you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or an Investment Plan evaluation. No matter which is the method that you have used (the “Monthly Average” method, or the “Net Present Value” method, or the “Internal Rate of Return” method), you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Financial Analysis paradox Part 2: Why the “Monthly Average method” delivers a better result than “Net Present Value”, when used in “Company based scenarios”? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/a-financial-analysis-paradox-part-1-which-is-the-method-that-lays-one-step-behind-in-evolution-from-net-present-value-and-yet-delivers-a-better-result-when-used-in-company/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>A Financial Analysis paradox Part 2: Why the “Monthly Average method” delivers a better result than “Net Present Value”, when used in “Company based scenarios”? &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=204#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO on Financial Analysis   Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy    Skip to content HomeAbout the author        &#8592; A Financial Analysis paradox Part 1: Which is the method that lays one step behind in evoluti... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO on Financial Analysis   Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy    Skip to content HomeAbout the author        &larr; A Financial Analysis paradox Part 1: Which is the method that lays one step behind in evoluti&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
