<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems of “Net Present Value” Part 1: Fit only for “Bond based scenarios”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/</link>
	<description>Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Financial Analyst’s wish list Part 1: Attack of the multicolored spreadsheet &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>A Financial Analyst’s wish list Part 1: Attack of the multicolored spreadsheet &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=178#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] or the “Net Present Value” method, or the “Internal Rate of Return” method), you know that there are problems and inaccuracies in the method to begin with, and that, thru no fault of yours, many of your figures are not a product of a solid calculation, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or the “Net Present Value” method, or the “Internal Rate of Return” method), you know that there are problems and inaccuracies in the method to begin with, and that, thru no fault of yours, many of your figures are not a product of a solid calculation, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sensitivity Analysis: How the right idea can get spoiled by the problems of the implementation &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensitivity Analysis: How the right idea can get spoiled by the problems of the implementation &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=178#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] of the forecaster’s work. Generally speaking, let’s say that it is ±A% inaccurate. If the calculation method we use has built-in inaccuracies, like we have already seen in the “Net Present Value” method (let’s say that it is ±B% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the forecaster’s work. Generally speaking, let’s say that it is ±A% inaccurate. If the calculation method we use has built-in inaccuracies, like we have already seen in the “Net Present Value” method (let’s say that it is ±B% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internal Rate of Return: variation on the theme of “Net Present Value”, with no improvements, when used in “Company based scenarios” &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Internal Rate of Return: variation on the theme of “Net Present Value”, with no improvements, when used in “Company based scenarios” &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=178#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] another method, but simply a variation on the theme of the “Net Present Value” method. So, everything that has already been said about NPV applies equally to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another method, but simply a variation on the theme of the “Net Present Value” method. So, everything that has already been said about NPV applies equally to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Problems of “Net Present Value” Part 2: It has a built-in inaccuracy of 12 months when used in “Company based scenarios” &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/index.php/2010/09/08/problems-of-net-present-value-part-1-fit-only-for-bond-based-scenarios/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Problems of “Net Present Value” Part 2: It has a built-in inaccuracy of 12 months when used in “Company based scenarios” &#124; CEO on Financial Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceo-on-financial-analysis.com/?p=178#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO on Financial Analysis   Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy    Skip to content HomeAbout the author        &#8592; Problems of “Net Present Value” Part 1: Fit only for “Bond based scenarios” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO on Financial Analysis   Financial Analysis was never so accurate, clear and easy    Skip to content HomeAbout the author        &larr; Problems of “Net Present Value” Part 1: Fit only for “Bond based scenarios” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
